Současná Evropa 2019, 2019(2):40-52

Slovakia´s Participation in Environmental Diplomacy

Michaela Čiefová

With the intensifying threat of climate change and further environmental problems, the im-portance of environmental diplomacy increases as well, both as theory and practice. In the first part of the paper, we offer an overview of theoretical knowledge of environmental diplomacy. Next, we focus on Slovakia and its activities related to this particular dimension of diplomacy. Information gained from the scientific literature and relevant online portals was complemented by four interviews with key informants. Our findings underline the thesis that Slovakia participates in environmental diplomacy primarily as a member of international organizations. Research on environmental diplomacy and the environment in Slovakia demonstrates potential also for the future.

Published: December 17, 2020  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Čiefová, M. (2019). Slovakia´s Participation in Environmental Diplomacy. Contemporary Europe2019(2), 40-52
Download citation

References

  1. 1. Benedick, R.E., 1999. Diplomacy for the environment. In: Environmental Diplomacy. Conference Report. Washington, D.C.: American Institute for Contemporary German Studies. pp. 3-12.
  2. 2. Blaxekjær, L.Ø., 2016. New Practices and Narratives of Environmental Diplomacy. In: Sosa-Nunez, G., Atkins, E., eds. Environment, Climate Change and International Relations. Bristol: E-International Relations Publishing. pp. 143-161.
  3. 3. Convention on wetlands of international importance especially as waterfowl habitat, [online]. Available at: https://treaties.un.org/Pages/showDetails.aspx?objid=0800000280104c20 [accessed 22 June 2020].
  4. 4. Černota, M., 2017. Utečenci a životné prostredie: princípy rozhodovania a vybrané riešenia. Economic, political and legal issues of international relations 2017, 72-76.
  5. 5. Dudášová, M., 2017. Popieranie klimatických zmien ako výzva environmentálnej diplomacie. Does environmental diplomacy reflect new challenges regarding climate change?, 20-34.
  6. 6. EDGE, 2019. Environmental Diplomacy and Geopolitics, [online]. Available at: http://labos.ulg.ac.be/edge/ [accessed 12 June 2020].
  7. 7. Enviroportál, 2020a. Európska environmentálna agentúra, [online]. Available at: https://www.enviroportal.sk/europska-environmentalna-agentura [accessed 11 June 2020].
  8. 8. Enviroportál, 2020b. Pôsobnosť SR v EEA, [online]. Available at: https://www.enviroportal.sk/europska-environmentalna-agentura/sr-v-eea [accessed 11 June 2020].
  9. 9. Enviroportál, 2020c. Medzinárodné dohovory, [online]. Available at: https://www.enviro- portal.sk/dokumenty-1/medzinarodne-dohovory [accessed 13 June 2020].
  10. 10. Enviroportál, 2020d. Kompletný zoznam dohodovor, [online]. Available at: https://www.enviroportal.sk/dokumenty-1/medzinarodne-dohovory/zoznam [accessed 15 June 2020].
  11. 11. EUBA, 2019. Radically New Approach to Climate Diplomacy, [online]. Available at: https://euba.sk/en/activities/news/1640-radically-new-approach-to-climate-diplomacy [accessed 12 June 2020].
  12. 12. European Environment Agency (EEA), 2019. The European environment - state and outlook 2020: knowledge for transition to a sustainable Europe. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
  13. 13. European Environment Agency, 2020. Drivers of change of relevance for Europe´s environment and sustainability. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
  14. 14. Ide, T., 2020. The dark side of environmental peacebuilding. World Development, 127. Go to original source...
  15. 15. Ioan, S., 2013. Green Diplomacy - The Chance to Mitigate the Effects of the Economic Crisis in the Context of Sustainable Development. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 81: 224-228. Go to original source...
  16. 16. Janubová, B., 2017. Environmentálna zraniteľnosť v Latinskej Amerike a Karibiku. Does environmental diplomacy reflect new challenges regarding climate change?, 67-78.
  17. 17. Li, G., Zakari, A., Tawiah, V., 2020. Does environmental diplomacy reduce CO2 emissions? A panel group means analysis. Science of The Total Environment, 722. Go to original source...
  18. 18. Ministry of environment of the Slovak Republic (MESR), 2020a. Európska únia, [online]. Available at: https://www.minzp.sk/eu/ [accessed 11 June 2020].
  19. 19. Ministry of environment of the Slovak Republic (MESR), 2020b. UNESCO, [online]. Available at: https://www.minzp.sk/medzinarodne-organizacie/unesco/ [accessed 11 June 2020].
  20. 20. Ministry of environment of the Slovak Republic (MESR), 2020c. [online]. Available at: https://www.minzp.sk/medzinarodne-organizacie/oecd/ [accessed 12 June 2020].
  21. 21. Ministry of environment of the Slovak Republic (MESR), 2020d. Slovenské predsedníctvo vo Vyšehradskej skupine, [online]. Available at: https://www.minzp.sk/v4-sk/ [accessed 20 November 2020].
  22. 22. Pajtinka, E., 2007. Slovenská diplomacia a jej dimenzie v 21. storočí. Zahraničná politika a diplomacia Slovenskej repuliky v kontexte európskej integrácie, 77-84.
  23. 23. Pajtinka, E., 2015. Základy teórie a praxe diplomacie. Bratislava: Pamiko.
  24. 24. Puskarova, P., Dancakova, I., 2018. Malthus is still breathing: Environmental concerns and attitudes towards immigration in Europe. Mondes en Développement, 4: 65-81. Go to original source...
  25. 25. Rusiňák, P., 2012. O charaktere diplomacie ako vedeckej disciplíny. Almanach, 7(3): 58-84.
  26. 26. Seresová, K., 2017. Jazyk politiky a jeho funkcie. Jazyk a politika : na pomedzí lingvistiky a politológie II, 15-20.
  27. 27. Tayebi, S., Moosavi,, S.F., Poorhashemi, S.A., 2016. Environmental Diplomacy: A Framework for Growth of International Interaction and Cooperation for Achievement of Global Peace. Journal of Politics and Law, 9(9): 150-154. Go to original source...
  28. 28. Tayebi, S., Moosavi, S.F., Poorhashemi, S.A., 2017. International interaction and global peace in light of international convergence: a strategy to achieve environmental diplomacy. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 14: 1573-1582. Go to original source...
  29. 29. Tomety, Y.D., Puškárová, P., Gemenne, F., Ozer, P., 2018. The complexity of environmental migration: Case of the returned Burkinabe Fulani breeders from Bouna department in Ivory Coast to Noumbiel province in Burkina Faso. Journal of International Relations, 16(1): 22-38.
  30. 30. Torney, D., Cross, M.K.D., 2017. Environmental and Climate Diplomacy: Building Coalitions Through Persuasion. European Union External Environmental Policy. Palgrave Macmillan. pp. 39-58. Go to original source...
  31. 31. Udovič, B., Pongrac, M., 2016. The Development, (Non) Institutionalisation, and (Lost) Opportunities of Slovenian Environmental Diplomacy in the Last 25 Years. Croatian International Relations Review, 22(76): 29-51. Go to original source...
  32. 32. UNESCO, Convention Concerning the Protection of the World Cultural and Natural Heritage, [online]. Available at: https://whc.unesco.org/en/conventiontext/ [accessed 12 June 2020].
  33. 33. UNESCO, 2020. States Parties Rafitication Status, [online]. Available at: https://whc.unesco.org/en/statesparties/ [accessed 22 June 2020].
  34. 34. United Nations, 2020. Funds, Programmes, Specialized Agencies and Others, [online]. Available at: https://www.un.org/en/sections/about-un/funds-programmes-specialized-agencies-and-others/index.html [accessed 12.June.2020].
  35. 35. United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), 2020. About environmental rights and governance, [online]. Available at: https://www.unenvironment.org/explore-topics/environmental-governance/about-environmental-rights-and-governance [accessed 10 June 2020].

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.